/int/ - International

1) pedos get banned if they post pedo pics 2) neutrality

KC.net doesn't exist >pedos People who are mentally ill and deserve help. Society should make it possible to get that help without too much stigma. We also shouldn't forget that most pedos never molest children and that most child molesters aren't pedophile but molest the children to get a feeling of power. Happy to have them here as long as they don't post loli and shota stuff. Just get therapy. >Putin Imperialist dictator who shall burn in hell.

>>7677 >>7678 Not great, not terrible responses. I'll stick around. t. Bernd since Winnenden

Pedos need to be shot and I don't want this to be /pol/ so keep Putin and all that crap that comes with it away please.

>pedos Kids are gross >putin Don't care

>>7678 You can't be serious lmao

>>7693 It's a local lib clown, the probability of it being an actual foid hole is approaching 1.

>>7694 He's not a foid, foids wouldn't dare to be contrarian on edgy imageboards. That's how you get attentionwhores like Yvonne "I hate le Jews don't hit on me silly Bernds teehee PENIS". I don't share most of his opinions but I prefer this one.

>>7693 Why not? What's your option? That pedophiles woke up some day and decided that their dicks go hard for prepubescent children? I can't imagine why anyone would choose to be a pedophile. It must suck hard to be attracted to children.

>>7696 The ones that are annoying on imageboards actively decide not to get help and to flood the board with talk about their perversions and "legal" pictures of "cute girls" if they don't straight up post cp. They deserve to be beaten to death.

>>7698 Not sure I agree with lethal violence there, but I would prefer them not to spam the imageboards I frequent. Loli/shota threads can go to >>>/m/ and the posters should be banned IMHO. It's not a choice to be attracted, but it's a choice to be a nuisance to your fellow Bernds. A bad one.

>>7700 It's also a big difference between an occasional "Lolifaden" on old KC versus pedo shit all the fucking time on Kohl. Even on old /int/ pedoshit was banned, it was contained to /b/ and usually wasn't erotic pics. Kohl is a cancerous shithole.

>>7701 Maybe I've become less tolerant or they have become more annoying. On old KC, I just ignored the loli/shota cancer. Today, I wouldn't want it. I haven't lurked on Kohl long enough to say how bad it is there. I'm happy that most people here are against that kind of threads.

>>7702 >>7701 We had this discussion already on /b/. The problem with lolibernd is that if he's tolerated he floods any thread with lolis.

>>7703 Then let's not tolerate him. There's a perfectly cancerous imageboard he can spam with his cancer.

>>7701 >and usually wasn't erotic pics Yeah I don't want your "cute girls at the beach" shit, either.

>>7704 >Then let's not tolerate him. No. Lets hang you both on the same gallows.