/int/ - International

Vee haff wayz to make you post.

Eintragsmodus: Antworten [Zurück] [Gehe nach unten]

Betreff:
Säge:
Kommentar:
Zeichnung: x Zeichenfläche
Dateien:
Passwort: (Kommentarlöschung)
  • Erlaubte Dateitypen: GIF, JPG, PNG, NetzM, OGG, ZIP und mehr
  • Maximale Anzahl von Dateien pro Post: 4
  • Maximale Dateigröße pro Post: 100.00 MB
  • Lies die Regeln bevor du postest.

de Bernd 2025-07-25 13:25:15 Nr. 3944

Datei öffnen 59.66 KB, 412x462
Pfostenbild
We all know how Socratic/Platonic philosophy is based on the idea of asking questions. Socrates questioned his interlocutors (in Plato's dialogues) until they no longer had any certainty or conviction on their side. All of that was done in the pursuit of truth of course. But I wondered, weren't the people he spoke to happier, when they were certain of their opinions? What is the benefit of asking until nothing is certain anymore, if it makes people unhappy, even if it's closer to the truth?
Sometimes your beliefs don't work anymore. In fact it has been argued that if your belief system can be dismantled by simply questioning it, then it was either weak or became dysfunctional long ago. There aren't eternal truths, only truths good enough to answer as much as we can with our current experience of things. Socrates is usually seen as being in the transition era between the archaic-mythical-heroic greece and classical-philosophical greece precisely because it seems it was an era of radical changes in the nation which rendered their old beliefs dysfunctional and so they started questioning it. Sometimes our beliefs are burdens.
Truth is its own reward :)
People can be happy and confident while doing stupid things, but stupid things don't usually lead to good results.
Because for chads logic is more important than muh feelings
those dialogues are fantasy and possibly socrates himself