/int/ - International

>cant make food thanks to the nords What?

>>28749 80% where i live is surround by florest. We can't take some down to produce food cuz the nords pay bilions to maintain this shit and a lot of people starve.

Amazonia is simply fucked. I'd give up on living there if I were you.

>>28756 Brazil produces more than enough food to supply its whole population. It's your government that lets you go hungry.

>>28756 >80% where i live is surround by florest You meant forest? What prevents food from exported to your region? All meat in my country is from Argentina and Uruguay.

>>28858 >>28988 They are too poor to import food because environmentalists keep their economy from developing by forbidding basic stuff, like basic infrastructure such as roads.

Good, the world has too many people as it is.

>>29006 Then why they live there?

>>29006 Blaming foreigners for internal problems is always a good idea. I'm just disappointed you couldn't come up with something more creative.

>In 2024, Brazil was the second-biggest grain exporter in the world, with 19% of the international market share, and the fourth overall grain producer.[7] Brazil is also the world's largest exporter of many popular agriculture commodities like coffee, soybeans, organic honey, beef, poultry, cane sugar, soybean meal, açai berry, orange juice, yerba mate, cellulose, tobacco, and the second biggest exporter of cotton, corn, pork, and ethanol.[8] The country also has a significant presence as producer and exporter of rice, wheat, eggs, refined sugar, soybean oil, cocoa, beans, nuts, cassava, sisal fiber, and diverse fruits and vegetables.[9] Ah yes, you're starving because foreigners want you to stop deforestation. Just one more acre of deforestation and amazonians can have food. I'm sure the corpos will not use the additional land for more profits but finally feed the locals.

>>29052 >internal problems Yes, foreigners are totally not preachy about how we should run our territory, like what's happening ITT. >>29054 Amazonia is forbidden from making use of is own territory for the most basic things. This comign from people who think it would be complete lunacy to suggest the same from them.

>>29071 What is the economic reason for people to live there?

>>29071 So why destroy the rainforest when the food-producing states could give food rather than sell it to the nords?

>>29071 >Yes, foreigners are totally not preachy about how we should run our territory, like what's happening ITT. >make a thread about brazilian politics <complain that people discuss brazilian politics holy shit, a talking monkey

If I had even minimal authority over nuclear bombs, I'd have nuked the amazon by now. You should be happy that I'm just a powerless mentally ill NEET without any type of position to be able to influence such decisions. Because otherwise, we wouldn't be talking about the amazon in present tense, but instead in past tense. Regards, climate change denier and environmental hater.

>>29097 Maybe it's very difficult/expensive to transport grains and vegetables to isolated settlements in the Amazon.

>>29104 But this is what prompts me to wonder why people live there at all, it's dense jungle forest, what is the economic reason to live there? What kind of employment there is?

>>29105 >what is the economic reason to live there? What kind of employment there is? I heard illegal logging is quite profitable. And on the illegally cleared former rainforest, you can herd cattle and export the beef.